Influencing group communication
Finally, the leader should ensure that a record is kept of the group's progress and decisions.
The antecedents of group communication in this tradition are found in early investigations of whether groups could be more successful at accomplishing tasks than an individual could be.
The leader needs to introduce the topic and establish the procedures to be followed.
Factors affecting group communication
Social norms are sets of shared beliefs about how people should behave. Many of the issues that motivated the original research on groups apply to technologically supported groups. Their work was motivated to improve the quality of public discourse. A lack of attention to etiquette, on the other hand, can create divisions while encouraging gossip and feelings of resentment, all of which can present serious impediments to effective communication. The number of members can be used to distinguish groups from other forms of social behavior, such as crowds, organizations, and interpersonal relationships. The third period, to , is marked by an interest in improving the effectiveness of organizations. Interpersonal communication factors that influence effective communication include ability to listen, nonverbal communication, culture and conflict resolution.
Virtual teams, especially those whose members are widely dispersed, can face additional challenges such as differences in language, culture, and time zones.
Effective group communication relies on understanding interpersonal communication basics and how they can improve or hinder messages.
Effective group communication can help us reap the maximum benefit from our participation.
Factors affecting group performance
In addition, many innovations in using groups to aid individual therapy and to help manage organizations emerged from this initial movement to help citizens. Geographically dispersed groups connected via the Internet, for example, are likely to communicate much differently than individuals who work in the same room with each other every day. What rules or guidelines of behavior must the group follow? More communication, then, is not in principle better than less communication. The ideal attitude would be: "I think this is a good idea or I wouldn't offer it, but it's up to the rest of you to determine what to make of it. There can also be negative consequences to group cohesion. The advent of computer and telecommunication networks has not altered this quest, but it has brought about opportunities for group interaction that were impossible and even inconceivable in the past. If the leader notices the attempt, he or she can call the person by name and ask for the contribution. The leader needs to be sensitive to attempts to participate. A good network ensures that information is available when needed and that the network does not become overloaded with irrelevant information. The hope is that decision-making practice can be improved by figuring out these factors. Membership in a cohesive team can also have negative consequences. This allows information to flow more freely, but often with less consistency in format or distribution. It necessitates being frank and open in dealings with others.
But if you are in the presence of others, you have no choice but to communicate something. Conflict Resolution With team communication comes conflict. Post navigation. However, messages are more than just a signal about what the group is.
Words and events are likely to mean different things to different group members See Extension Circular
based on 23 review