Despite all the arguments against Utilitarianism, there are some valid points for the theory. Supporters of the theory would argue that promoting pleasure must be a good thing as most people see pleasure as desirable over pain. It is also difficult to decide whether an outcome is morally good or bad.
People have contrasting opinions on what they think is right or wrong and it depends on the individual who is making the decision. And nope, we don't source our examples from our editing service!
What hooks you? It Asserts that we should always act so as to produce the greatest ratio of good to evil for everyone concerned with our decision and As with all moral theories, has many strengths and weaknesses. Utilitarianism also allows people to contemplate the situation before making the decision.
Who wrote this essay? He said that Utilitarianism could therefore be used to promote a dictatorship, in which decisions were made to over-ride the interests of the individual in favour of the greater good of society.
This would be closer to the principals Jesus lived by. People have contrasting opinions on what they think is right or wrong and it depends on the individual who is making the decision. John Rawls Without an absolute definition of happiness, it is hard to arrive at a 'right' decision.
Reading example essays works the same way!
Is long term or short term pleasure more valuable?